A 'state-affiliated media' label, alternatively known as a 'state-controlled media' label or 'state-funded media' label, is a controversial label that platform(s) may use to denote accounts as state media. It initially started with YouTube in 2018,¹⁾ then spread in 2020²⁾³⁾ and worsened.

In the aftermath of Facebook's Cambridge Analytica data scandal boosting conservative campaigns, the tech industry became heavily scrutinized, not for its political origins,⁴⁾ but for its impact on politics. Several politicians were quick to escalate this as a 'national security' issue, blaming their real-world shortcomings over allegations of foreign electoral interference, rather than go through any periods of reflection.

As a response, YouTube added state-funded media labels in 2018, which were so incredibly *thorough* that even Radio Free Asia had a label.⁵⁾ However, the same can't be said for companies that allow national security consultants to suggest copying it, but selectively enforce this onto state media from countries deemed antagonistic to the United States (e.g. China, Russia, Iran),⁶⁾⁷⁾⁸⁾ showing its bias.

On the surface, the labels simply allow users to recognize whether a post was from 'state media' and provide an opportunity for users to scrutinize others for interacting with said media, while allowing the companies to hype themselves up for 'finding a solution' and the state to protect its own interests. However, its often selective implementation has caused a number of possible consequences to surface, as detailed below.

The first issue is that 'state media' is an incredibly broad label. Who gets to define 'state media', and how is it being applied? If we allow the state to define it, wouldn't it be counterintuitive to declare what sources are 'thoughtcrimes' or 'wrongthink', then enabling a reverse psychology effect? People also forget that their own state often has state media,⁹⁾ which shines light on 'state media with extra steps'.

For better or for worse, there have recently been efforts to help define or explain the nuances between 'state media' and 'public media', such as the Media and Journalism Research Center's seven-category matrix which factors in its funding, governing body, and supposed editorial agenda. On that note, independent outlets are equally capable of pushing its own propaganda, but this is deviating into a much larger issue.

The second issue is that these labels ironically enable a reverse psychology effect, so users who normally wouldn't engage with said content might feel inclined. After all, some people don't like being told what to do. However, it's ultimately up to the individual if they want to slander it like sheep, or simply engage with the other side to get a 'different perspective' and come to their own conclusions.

Besides, if somebody was smart enough to understand that propaganda doesn't work as long as somebody is willing to hear the other side, knowing that propagandists work hard to push the 'us vs. them' dichotomy, typically banning outlets to stop people from drawing their own conclusions, they might be smart enough to find a workaround (e.g. archivers, shorteners) or put this perspective into words, don't you think?

The final issue is that it takes a lot of energy to willingly confront people or get into arguments on the internet, especially when you know it'll probably be a colossal waste of time when it's more likely that one would be confronting: an internet troll, a non-genuine social persona, or a social bot posing as an internet troll, which is especially popular amongst people who subscribe to the dead internet theory.

I'd also like to highlight Facebook's attempts to spin the labels as a 'positive' change,¹⁰⁾¹¹⁾ knowing that their real name policy essentially throws users into this psychological, no-win hostage situation, where they either must conform (i.e. groupthink) or risk ostracization (i.e. cancel culture) for being themselves. In other words, it's small things like this that contribute to the ongoing political polarization crisis.

• YouTube - since February 2nd, 2018.¹²⁾
• Facebook - since June 4th, 2020.¹³⁾
• Twitter - from August 6th, 2020¹⁴⁾ to April 21st, 2023.
• Instagram - since October 5th, 2020.¹⁵⁾
• TikTok - since January 18th, 2023.¹⁶⁾

• Politics of the United States