Nameless Rumia's Wiki

I'm tired of the internet!

User Tools

Site Tools


personal_wiki

Personal wiki

A personal wiki is a type of wiki used for one's personal knowledge management, removing all of the collaborative elements for a digital commonplace book, mind map, or zettelkasten. In other words, a wiki repurposed as a 'second brain' or personal blog of sorts.

Back in the late 2000s, there used to be a small personal wiki craze, but most of these projects ended up being abandoned for one reason or another. In recent years, however, there has been a curious personal wiki renaissance, though not at the level of the late 2000s.

Summary

The general appeal for the individual is that wiki software is really easy to use, compared to blogs and static pages, and things like arbitrary hierarchies (e.g. 'editorships'), edit wars, notability, talk pages, or vandalism aren't a problem if you have full control over it. If the personal wiki is local or offline, petty things like copyright violations, DMCA, legal threats, or plagiarism are even less of a problem.

For readers, personal wikis are interesting for the same reasons why people even bother to read blog posts or status updates on social media. You have immediate access to a subject and don't need to sift through thirty pages to get an understanding of a person's undiluted thoughts, and it feels more human since it's run by a person and not a faceless collective like regular wikis.

Wiki software

This personal wiki uses and recommends DokuWiki for reasons that will be explained in this section, but it all comes down to what software you feel comfortable with using, similar to web browsers.

  • DokuWiki - The lightweight wiki software that can be installed with ease as you just need to pick from a dropdown menu. You also have DokuWiki on a Stick, if you want to run an offline wiki.
  • MediaWiki - The traditional, bloated software that many wikis use. I would not advise using this as it's designed for large-scale projects, and a pain in the ass to convert to a personal wiki.
  • Notion - The productivity software, often associated with note-taking, that can be used to host a wiki. However, while it does have a free plan, do note that it utilizes a freemium business model.

Of course, there's many kinds of wiki software than the ones I've listed, but I'm really not interested in testing more (e.g. TiddlyWiki, Notion) or fiddling with old-fashioned CamelCase wikis.

Examples

Archived personal wikis

  • Everything Shii Knows - The personal wiki run by “Shii”, preserved by Bibliotheca Anonoma. This was something you'd find diving into 4chan history. The rest is… not worth mentioning.1)
  • Everything Anon Knows - The personal wiki “Humblefool” ran, hosted on a WAKAchan affiliate. It's not as interesting, but shows what was kinda relevant in the late 2000s.
  • World2ch Historical Society - The personal wiki that “0037” wrote, named after World2ch. He did write some pages after 2016, but vanished after I emailed about “lost AA” in the drama bomb.

Active personal wikis

Note: If I ever find out that a personal wiki links to this wiki, then I might consider adding it. This is not an incentive or guarantee.

  • Compendium of Personal Ignorance - The personal wiki of "Pato" (Argiebro).2) It's a bit of a mess to dive into, honestly, but does cover a wide range. He also runs an Overtext.
  • Essarr Lorebook - The personal wiki of “Ninjasr”. He mostly goes over concepts, media, reviewing said media, and linguistics. Doesn't have a huge internet presence, otherwise.
  • Everything Killsushi Knows - The personal wiki of a user with many names, typically “Archdude”, “153”, or “Tokiko”, but not actually “Killsushi”. Mostly philosophical in some bizarre way.
  • The Nonexistent Fandoms Fandom - The personal wiki of “Outer”, though it's kind of a website at the same time. Covers some more obscure AA stuff, amongst other things.

Criticisms

Having personal opinions

Generally speaking, the main criticism against personal wikis is 'having a subjective opinion', which shouldn't be a surprise. These kinds of things are bound to upset people. Nobody cares whenever you're 'right', but people are primed to impale you whenever you're 'wrong' in their eyes. Honestly, people have been doing this for ages, whether it be bloggers, columnists, talk show hosts, talk radio hosts, and so forth.3)

You just have to own it, stop caring after getting enough strongly worded messages, and know that there's a relatively small chance that people would recognize you anyways. Eventually, it gets amusing to see when critics dance around being upset over a subjective opinion and, rather than admit this upfront,4) they resort to grandiose words like 'gossip', 'narrative', 'propaganda', 'whitewashing', etc.5)

Personal vs. Encyclopedic

In a way, this personal wiki is a bit weird as it isn't 'personal' per se, due to the fact that it's partially written in an 'encyclopedic' manner, and therefore 'impersonal' in some areas6) as it relies on third-party sources to string together some semblance of a story. It's like what historians and drama-oriented communities do when there's clearly an interesting story to tell, but a void of authors willing to step up and tell them.

Some would argue that a 'true personal wiki' would just consist of editorial pieces, but a counterargument is that this ruins the point. Personally, the goals of this personal wiki is to gather 'supplemental information' that would otherwise not exist or be scattered across the internet, not reinvent the blog in a digital age where blogging software and microblogging platforms are abundant.

Notes

  • There have been attempts to coin a term for the personal wiki, but “wikiblog” is the only attempt that sounds serious. WikiWiki founder Ward Cunningham tried coining “bliki”,7) but it sounds like bad video game onomatopoeia, nobody respects it,8)9) and people will just think of a pistol now.
  • When you frame personal wikis into the so-called Stages of the Web model: would it fit into “Web 1.0” because it delivers static content, or “Web 2.0” because of the software that it borrows?
  • Once you've spent a long time gaining experience, writing personal wiki articles, you may feel the need to constantly redo your older articles, but do consider the amount of time you've spent on them.
  • Be warned that public personal wikis will be vulnerable to unauthorized AI scraping, and this style of writing can be a poison if you have college or university aspirations. Can you imagine how frustrating it must be for students to spend hours writing an essay, only for it to be called AI-generated?
  • You probably won't find much, but a personal wiki is known as a “gèrén wiki” (个人Wiki, 个人维基) in Chinese, a “kojin wiki” (個人Wiki) in Japanese, and a “gaein wiki” (개인 위키) in Korean.

See also

1)
At the time, “Shii” was a self-proclaimed libertarian, so a number of his pages haven't really aged well.
2)
“Pato” (lit. “Duck”) is what I personally remember him as, since that's the name people called him when he was an early 4chan Cup commentator. He has other names, but they aren't as easy to remember.
3)
The difference is that authors of personal wikis aren't getting paid, but this could hypothetically change.
4)
One would be inclined to toy with how much these critics value the idealist concept of 'freedom of speech' if they refuse to admit, in the simplest terms, that they dislike a subjective opinion.
5)
Do remember that there's always the civil approach of actually talking to people if you want something changed or, at least, exercise an attempt to understand their angle or approach. You won't change anything if you just stew and stash your complaints in an anonymous community or a private guild, after all.
6)
It's also worth noting that my writing style on this personal wiki does attempt to limit first-person pronouns, which is an intentional choice due to a subtle impact that it has on the audience.
7)
"What Is a Bliki" (May 23, 2003). Martin Fowler.
8)
"Personal wiki". Everything Shii Knows.
personal_wiki.txt · Last modified: 2025-01-16 01:01:09 by namelessrumia